UPDATE: 20 November, late PM.
A revised version has been uploaded – it restates the margin-of-error, adds a bar chart to the composite results and fixes a few bugs and layout errors.
* * *
This is the second installation in the report “Name Recognition and Perception of Quality in Brand Names of (French) Horns,” the details of which can be looked at here and here, in case you missed it.
This new installation includes the original report and first appendix. The big difference with this update however is the addition of a second appendix.
Report and appendices
The initial report gives overview information and composite statistical results expressed in both raw numbers and calculated percentages. Appendix I organizes the numbers similarly, but it channels the data into one of three age groups.
In the new Appendix II the same data is looked at from a different direction – from experience level.
- Student
- Professional
- Enthusiast
- Other
Trusted names by experience level
If you are already up-to-speed, the new data begins on page 25 of this PDF.
For the time being the “other” category analysis was left out. That will be added on the next round of updates and appendices, sometime next week.
Buying or selling something?
Check out Horn Matters Classified Ads!
Please visit our advertising sponsors:
Related articles:
- From the Who’s Who Survey: 14 New Comparison Charts in a New Report
- Thoughts on ‘Quality’ and an Overview of Trusted Brands in French Horns
- Trusted Brand Names of French Horns: Composite and Age Group Results
- Who Reads Horn Matters? Spring 2011 Update
- 3 Aspects of Achieving Fame and a Look at the Park Effect
- Orchestral Experience Questionnaire
- 2010 Web Site Stats Report
